- Which mac to get for video editing full#
- Which mac to get for video editing pro#
- Which mac to get for video editing software#
The GPU is a limiting factor here and a dedicated GPU will likely be a benefit to you.Ĭanon RAW from the C200 was an interesting flip. Export times are no different between the Beta and standard versions of Premiere.
Which mac to get for video editing full#
Even going to half resolution isn’t quite at the full 24fps. Playback definitely isn’t great, running about half speed when playing at full resolution. For 10-bit H.265 where you don’t have the same exact hardware encoding you actually don’t see much improvement over the Beta version.įor some more fun Max pulled in some RED RAW footage. The M1 Mac clocked in at 7 minutes and 19 seconds – nearly half the speed of the Beta version of Premiere. The next test does a similar export but with H.265/HEVC footage.
Which mac to get for video editing software#
It’s certainly better now, but Max points out that it isn’t as good as fully optimized software like Final Cut or even Resolve which does the same job in 3-5 minutes. Compared to a non-optimized version of Premiere which finished in ~13 minutes this is noticeable faster.Īnd the Intel MacBook clocked in at 18 minutes. A 5 minute 8-bit H.264 clip exported in 9 minutes and 10 seconds. Moving to a render test you will see that the GPU is being totally hit and fully used. Heading to half resolution – which is likely for a laptop display – you will get perfect playback and have some headroom. It was close, but capping out at 25-26 fps for a 30p clip. When moving to playback tests the full 4K playback did hit up against the limits of the GPU. It runs at just under 2 minutes today and there is likely room for even more optimal speed. Working with HEVC/H.265 footage Premiere can now take advantage of the M1’s hardware processing.
Which mac to get for video editing pro#
Current Premiere Pro took just 50 seconds, which is an improvement of 11 seconds over the Beta and over 4-5 minutes over the 16” Intel-based MacBook Pro. The 20 second clip took no time to stabilize on the M1 Mac and it only used about 50% of the CPU. Kicking things off is stabilizing a 4K image. All the M1 Macs should perform similarly. Let’s see where Max found benefits and drawbacks.Īll these tests were performed using a base 13.3” M1 MacBook Pro. Hardware optimizations make certain tasks a breeze and software has made things a lot better. There is no doubt that it is the start of something that will shape the future of computers.
The M1 chip is an impressive piece of engineering and design. It’s super interesting to see just how good (or bad) the M1 Macs are doing today as it is likely to only get better with more software tweaks and next-gen hardware on the horizon. These updates do mean that a ton of video editors can now enjoy full-speed performance on the latest Macs with their NLE of choice.įor a more nuanced investigation into whether M1 Macs are suitable for video editing in Premiere, filmmaker Max Yuryev has taken a much closer look. Now it’s because some major software support has just landed with Adobe Premiere Pro gaining M1 enhancements. Ah, the seemingly endless conversation on Apple Silicon continues to rage.
0 kommentar(er)
